Moving forward
Added 2017-07-16 22:46:09 +0000 UTCWell, I got some interesting responses these last few days, and a lot more positive support I figured someone like myself would ever get as well. As I said before, thanks to situations, anything new wouldn't be available for at -least- a few months from now, but many of you made it clear it would be better if this was per month instead of per content update. So I wanted to put something like that towards a vote: How would you feel about moving forward by a by month instead of per update situation? Like every other vote, I'll let this run for 72 hours, as I feel that should be more then enough time to get good judgement from everyone on their feelings about it. I'm living it a simple Yes/No as to not spread votes too thin to get any decent results, so if you have something extra to add towards your vote, do post it!
Comments
Im voting yes on the per month payment. But I will be unable to keep my usual 5$ patron, as my own finance is a bit shaky at the moment. Might squeeze it to a 3$ as your previous post made it clear that you have it rough.
Fred
2017-07-16 23:10:12 +0000 UTCLike I said, I understand the by Update format, and not wanting people to pay without anything to show for it. But even if there is month where there is no release, you still worked on it, and I believe that this alone is a reason for moving to a monthly format. Not to mention that you could use the help.
Noxgarm
2017-07-16 22:52:06 +0000 UTC
