Print tests completed
Added 2024-10-11 16:30:34 +0000 UTCNow available to all supporters
Link to models:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xxKKwmuhpDPEWJs68O1aJYjfHAiDRPU5-DRVb_dsSqM/edit
Thank you for your continued support!
Comments
the upper body split is the one that doesnt make sense...why split it at the breast instead of the panty line... the complex split will make it much more difficult to get a good fit
Tim Sloan
2024-10-15 14:55:28 +0000 UTC"too critical" was correct, "too print" is not
FISHING CAT
2024-10-14 18:10:22 +0000 UTCI agree with the comments on the seam but will not harp on that anymore. This is nice looking model but personally my issue with some models like this is it can be hard for someone who does not know what the model is to be able to tell what it is. Meaning there is nothing really identifying of Madelyne especially without color - it will just look like a sexy woman sitting on rock throne, still cool sure but maybe not much more. Sorry, I do not mean that to be too critical but for me, this is one that probably will not make it to print (I already have a Madelyne model).
Brad
2024-10-12 14:45:06 +0000 UTCthis x100. hiding seams needs work, cant just plane cut things to fit on the plate; I would upscale the full figure and re-slice it better.
Rhymes
2024-10-12 11:28:13 +0000 UTCit wulklk by also wnfs version ?
František Piliar
2024-10-11 22:22:03 +0000 UTCJust an observation. I would rather have the base split into three parts, with the back being separate, and the seam between the other two parts going to the side, rather than right down the center of the point of focus. Help us make the end product better by hiding seams wherever possible please!
Terry Holman
2024-10-11 20:01:49 +0000 UTC
