HOW DO YOU VIEW DR. GOOGLE?

I am a rebel in healthcare and I know it. I personally love Dr. Google because it tells me which of my patients are fully engaged and care and who want aggressive input by me instead of just applying conservative paradigm algorithms.  These patients help me identify who really needs me and who really just wants conventional advice.  It really is a time saver for a quantum mitochondriac clinician.  I want my patients to be collectors of information based upon their conditions and come to me with it so we can go over it and I can discuss with them why I agree with it and why I may not.  I trust my patients to make the decision when they hear both sides of the argument.  It seems many of my fellow MD's don't have my perspective and look at Dr. Google as a "problem."  I don't feel this way at all.  Here is the account of another MD.  I'd like to hear your comments below out these two perspectives.  

Dr. Homere said, "In a world of cyberchondria and a web polluted with unlimited medical data, patients are searching their symptoms, diagnoses and treatment options even before going to a physician. Nowadays, at least one third of patients go on the Internet for self-diagnosis — or, often, self-misdiagnosis.

After searching for a symptom, understanding e-medical facts is not as simple as reading hotel amenities or reviewing a pizza place. This paradigm introduces new patient behaviors that physicians are not prepared to deal with in medical school, nor during training years.

Data showed that more than fifty percent of patients do not share with their doctor that they searched the topic on the Internet. How do patients react if the physician gives them different information than what they read on the web? Do they trust him and ignore their research? Or would they go to another physician thinking this one is wrong and outdated?

Unfortunately, this is now a fact — we cannot fight it anymore or control it. All we can do as physicians is to be aware of it and understand patient’s fears and thoughts, after they have been “manipulated” by the Internet.

Physicians are compelled to make the effort of not only following valuable medical information in peer-reviewed journals and professional societies sites, but also they need to be aware of the set of data available for the public, data often put together by non-doctors. This will make doctors understand better patient’s concerns and try to build on or correct “common e-knowledge” when sometimes this knowledge is wrong, inaccurate, or does not apply to the patient’s actual situation.

On another note, since we cannot convince our patients not to go on the Internet as they “can’t help it.” Providers should not be shy to direct their patients on how to use this tool, by recommending accurate keywords that apply to their disease and suggest specific procedures to look up on video sharing platforms.

With millennials seeking more medical care, social media revolution and Internet-mania will further impact patient behavior. Providers have non-conformal tasks: to be aware of these new trends and influences, in order to integrate them in their practices and reinforce patient-doctor relationships; we mention in this article following public data from unconfirmed medical sources and counseling patients for accurate web searches."

Who do you agree with it?  Do you have a different take on this topic ?  I'd like to hear your ideas below.  Share it, if you feel compelled 

Homere Al Moutran is an otolaryngologist in NYC.  He can be reached on LinkedIn and Twitter @DrHom_NY.  I am Dr. Jack Kruse and I can be found on Linkedin and on twitter @DrJackKruse or at www.jackkruse.com