Legitimately asking, is this attractive?
Added 2024-09-09 16:44:10 +0000 UTC
Comments
LOL!!!!!!
Rich Blackman
2024-09-19 11:27:05 +0000 UTCI'm tired of imagining, Mathew
Z
2024-09-19 01:19:19 +0000 UTCI mean, mesh and fishnet in general, yeah, but these bedazzled versions, not really, the person it's on would already have to be pretty interesting for the dumb to be outweighed by the attraction, also, I agree with Pete, imperfect bodies are hot, honestly, a lot of things that women are worried about with their bodies I actually find attractive
Andrew Johnson
2024-09-18 11:09:17 +0000 UTCIt feels VERY MUCH bodies on display. Which can be attractive in the right context. I'm not sold that the met gala is the right context, though. I have been to events where that would fit right in and, let me tell you, the met gala could never.
Anthony Moore
2024-09-16 14:03:52 +0000 UTCThe cold models wearing this not so much. But a everyday beauty of a mother wearing it to tease some yeah. I find something perfect about imperfect bodies. If it's flawless feels like I am looking at a Barbie
Pete
2024-09-14 10:09:05 +0000 UTCIt might be different seeing them in person, but from those images, no I don't think any of them look attractive. Aside from the use of mesh (which you mentioned in another comment), I think the problem comes down to the dresses themselves are just poorly designed. Imagine any of those dresses made with regular material - both the style and shape of them are just horribly unflattering to the women wearing them. It feels like shock value was prioritised over anything else.
Dan Prati
2024-09-11 06:36:31 +0000 UTCReasons to not work corporate, tbh. Why require makeup? I know I mentioned it first, but I still don't understand WHY it's required...
Elizabeth Barnett
2024-09-11 04:51:43 +0000 UTCWhile I worked corporate there was a handbook that started what length skirt was the shortest you could wear, that if you wore a skirt you had to wear pantihose, that you were to wear a court shoe at least with a specified heel height. What amount of Makeup was expected. Men were told suits, tie, dress shoes. Yay was basically it
Nique
2024-09-11 04:03:29 +0000 UTCBodies on display
Rob Steedley
2024-09-10 17:07:33 +0000 UTCYes it is. Mostly for at home and sharing one on one though.
Mark Swartley
2024-09-10 14:28:42 +0000 UTCIf you wore sheer it wouldn’t be a small group talking on this 😂
Ovie
2024-09-10 13:26:38 +0000 UTCAttractive in the right setting. Not to go out with parents but an adults only vacation this dress would be top tier.
Ovie
2024-09-10 13:25:53 +0000 UTCI think my own opinion on this would be so far from the intended market as selling submarines to astronomy professors. That being said I am human so, not to my taste? Truly depends who is in there someone I went to see nearly naked fine ,if not ... is it right is not my place to answer for anybody else. Is it appropriate? Now there is a tough one if my sister wore one to my mother's care home? Or my niece to work at the hospital? Who judges these things (I would not! Especially against my sister)
John Fenwick
2024-09-10 03:46:51 +0000 UTCIn certain sectors of civilian life, women are still considered more "ornamental" (or at least their dress is). So they still have to wear "business" or "business casual", but they have a greater variety of what's acceptable. Here's an example, back when I worked a corporate job - I was one of 2 people up for promotion. It was given to the other person, because I A) didn't wear makeup and B) "didn't dress professionally". Except, as I pointed out, I wore *the same clothes as the dude the have the promotion* - we both wore dress pants, button down shirts and he wore *sneakers* while I wore dress flats. I was told that what was professional for a man wasn't what was professional for a woman. (Yes I did go to HR, I was transferred to a different department with a less sexist manager.) But even those corporate jobs have employee handbooks that lay out standards of dress. They just follow rules you don't know - those who work them do know, or at least are given the rules (they're stupid rules, I grant) But there are more jobs where there IS a unisex standard, thankfully!
Elizabeth Barnett
2024-09-10 02:03:17 +0000 UTCI like the reply. I was thinking about the purpose of clothing. I'm a nurse, and I wear boots, tactical pants, and pocket Henley shirts from Reebok and Duluth Trading respectively. I wear them on duty and off. No suits nor ties EVER. But I have noticed that while gentleman in a lot of careers wear suits and ties (they all look uncomfortable and constipated), there is usually no standard of dress for the females (if I am wrong, please let me know). This applies to dress/skirt length, clothing tightness/looseness, and neck plunge. The military changed years ago to unisex uniforms. Are there two different standards in the civilian world?
Earl Ross
2024-09-10 01:45:25 +0000 UTCNot attractive to me. Leaves nothing to the imagination
Rich Blackman
2024-09-09 21:37:28 +0000 UTCClothes need to be flattering and easy to wash.
Charles Lewis
2024-09-09 19:08:15 +0000 UTCImma paraphrase Robert Heinlein - clothing only has 2 functions - to keep the wearer safe from their environment, and to ensure the wearer passes on their genes. And, like, I'm one of those women who's railed against clothing double standards for my entire life - why could the boys run around in wife beaters or tank tops, but the girls had neckline and sleeve requirements*? From THAT perspective, every additional celebrity who demystifies the human body, the FEMALE body, so it's no longer acceptable to say "I saw X body part, I couldn't help myself**", is just another blow against reactionary bullshit. Other hand, you have to have a "perfect" body (whatever the fuck that means) because even these drop dead gorgeous women get crucified for, like, their boobs hanging 1/32 of an inch "too low", and that doesn't lead to anything except more cosmetic surgery for those who can afford it, and feeling like they can never be good enough for those who cannot. I guess, for me, it is about what the INTENTION of each piece is... *I was damned lucky, in that I went to high school in Northern CA in the 90s. After gym during weeks gym was in the pool, I was required to dry off and put on shoes. I attended SO many classes in a pair of daisy dukes over a bikini - and it wasn't a problem for the guys in my classes! **men legit say this, it's still somehow a legit defense, but WOMEN shouldn't be involved in business or politics because we can't control ourselves?!
Elizabeth Barnett
2024-09-09 18:43:02 +0000 UTCProbably the best and funniest friend I have had in a long time, if ever. Blows me away.
Earl Ross
2024-09-09 18:09:18 +0000 UTCWell put
Hippie
2024-09-09 18:01:52 +0000 UTCI agree. No matter the quality of the piece I think it just looks tasteless
Hippie
2024-09-09 18:01:42 +0000 UTCThank you! If I posted this there they would have restricted my account again
Hippie
2024-09-09 18:01:10 +0000 UTCOk that’s fair
Hippie
2024-09-09 18:00:44 +0000 UTCI think it looks like a beach cover up. I think every person should highlight their assets. I think it's a hard ask of a model. At least let them cover their nipples. Strippers have to, why not them?
Candece Webster
2024-09-09 18:00:06 +0000 UTCI think you nailed it right at the end. I think it's just bodies on display. I don't think the "clothing" itself adds anything, because the focus ends up being that something that is typically covered in public, isn't covered in this scenario. Beyond that, I can't help but think of stuff from Frederick's, which suggests that, at least for me, this is a style for the bedroom, not the runway.
Andrew Mech
2024-09-09 17:27:49 +0000 UTCAttractive? Yeah. Appropriate in public? For my taste, no. But that's just me because while I may think that's a private-only fashion, I have absolutely no right to declare what others may wear.
Eric At Random
2024-09-09 17:17:39 +0000 UTCBy the way, sheer clothing and Instagram. I got a notification from Instagram that Maggie had just posted a new video. She looked amazing in black. She opened the Patreon because she kept getting flagged for inappropriate content. I sent her a screenshot of the bottom of her post and the top of the next one, then sent her the video of the next one where the woman is totally exposed. Why the double standards?
Earl Ross
2024-09-09 17:15:30 +0000 UTCIt's definitely subjective. I'm a straight woman that is happy to admire the female body and I find this surprisingly unattractive. It's even worse on men, something about the mesh is not for me. I think leaving something to the imagination is better.
Renee Baus
2024-09-09 17:02:24 +0000 UTCFeels like pageantry, which I've never found attractive.
Carl Jordan
2024-09-09 17:00:18 +0000 UTCI think context matters with this. At the Met Gala, there is precedent for these types of risqué sartorial choices. It is a venue for artistic display, and at that event, the guests are part of the art. Also, as a nightlife choice, I have no problem with it-wear what you want to the club. If I ran into it at the grocery store, I'd probably be a little squeamish, because I generally struggle to not look at exposed boobs. But that's my problem, and I wouldn't dare make it yours. As to the attractive question, meh... there is something to be said about the self-confidence to wear it, so it certainly isn't disqualifying.
James McKay
2024-09-09 16:55:40 +0000 UTCYou are correct, it IS a subjective question. As a nurse, there are bodies we all wish we didn't have to see naked (my fat, old ass is one I would NEVER inflict on my friends and colleagues). That said, everyone should do what they want and are comfortable with. Even though you get 8 gagillion requests to do OnlyFans and show off all your goods, you don't and have made that clear. I, personally, as your fan and friend, found your recent attempt at creating sheer fashion much cooler and thrifty than this.
Earl Ross
2024-09-09 16:54:00 +0000 UTCCan't it be both? 🤔🤷♂️
Anthony Poole
2024-09-09 16:53:49 +0000 UTC
