Dear paid member,
Here are all the retouched images from the first set I shot with Alex.
They were all shot in ver low natural light which was supplemented by a small portable continuous light from the side.
The last image contains the camera settings - I chose the one with the highest ISO (5000). In the previous post with Alex which had another pic from this set with ISO 3200 one of you remarked that the image was surprisingly not grainy. What do you think about the one with ISO 5000?
To me, it seems that the claims Canon makes about the excellent performance of the EOS R system (and specifically the R6 Mark II on which these shots were taken) in low light are valid. Here’s a link to what they say:
https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/infobank/low-light-eos-r-system/
Ps: the entire shoot was done in Alex’s front room which had large windows but it was late in the afternoon and the light was low. It didn’t also help that the windows had a white privacy border that clearly reduced the light.
David OHare
2025-02-09 00:08:00 +0000 UTC