Hey everyone,
This poll is for Mercenary and up tiers, I'll post a public version within the next few days.
I'll weigh the results of the polls accordingly, which means the result here will have a higher influence on my decision than the public one.
As of now, TNT is compressed to webp/webm 90% quality to reduce file size (currently ~4 GB).
Of course, compression comes with a quality loss. The 90% is a compromise between quality and file size but lately, I got into thinking if it's worth it.
So why not ask you guys for your opinions?
I attached 3 files:
the original png downsized to 1080p, sitting at 2.5MB file size
the webp 90% quality, sitting at 200KB file size
lossless webp sitting at a file size of 1.8MB
There's a noticeable difference between the 2 webp images (mostly on her skin) but no real difference between png and lossless webp.
The question for you now is: Is the quality gain (going from 90% to lossless) worth a file size of roughly 4-5 times the actual file size (200KB vs 1.8MB is a pretty drastic example, not all lossless webp will be that much bigger).
Edit: Added webp 92/95/98/100 for comparison
Vleder
2024-03-18 22:52:45 +0000 UTCceolag
2024-03-18 21:07:46 +0000 UTCWolfram99
2024-03-18 20:30:02 +0000 UTCceolag
2024-03-18 19:43:20 +0000 UTC