Vote how MPMB should be updated to 5e 2024
Added 2024-10-17 19:46:33 +0000 UTCTL;DR: If this long post is too much, please do read “The Next Step” and vote in the poll.
The 5e 2024 edition (or 5.5, 5.24, One D&D, 50th anniversary, whatever you call it) is upon us and an update to the character sheet is in order. Hopefully, this much everybody can agree on.
How do you think I best go about updating my character sheet for this new edition? It is a weighted choice between getting it done fast and/or functionality improvements.
The next step of MPMB will be a web-app. I have talked about this before, but progress updates have been very few and far between (as there has been very little to report on). It is a project started from scratch, not reusing any of the AcroJS that's powering the PDFs, so I won't have much to show for it for a while longer. I’ll post updates whenever I can share more.
This poll is here to help me determine how I should divide my time between getting the PDF updated to the 2024 rules and/or the next-step web-app.
Whether this web-app will be for both the 2014 and 2024 versions of the rules, or just 2024, is fuel for a future poll. The games I’m playing in are still using the 2014 rules, but they might switch once all three core rulebooks are out.
Below you can read the explanation for the options in the poll. I’ve tried to keep them brief, but did include (non-exhaustive) examples of what kind of changes you can expect.
1 [Fastest] No changes, just content
A copy of the current sheets but with the 2024 rules. This would include no changes to the design, only changes to the options you can select. This will include necessary changes to the underlying code, for example:
Making ability scores bonuses at character creation based on backgrounds instead of race/species.
Add an option for wizards to print the full cantrip list, as they can change the ones they can cast on a long rest.
Add starting equipment to classes.
Prepared spells no longer calculated based on level + ability modifier.
Built-in support for weapon masteries.
2 [Moderate] Minimal design changes
The minimal necessary alterations to make the sheet design fit (better) with the 2024 rule changes. This would include the code changes from option 1 above, but also change the lay-out of the sheet, including:
Removing the Background Feature and using that space for feats and/or class features.
Moving the Personality Traits, Ideals, Bonds, and Flaws to the background page and using that space on the 2nd page for feats and/or class features.
Remove hit points from the wild shape sheets.
Update the reference sheet.
Updating the reference sheet is probably the most work, as it requires some playtesting to get it down to the most essential stuff only. If this “Minimal design changes” is the winner, I might put up another poll to gauge whether a reference sheet should be included or not (or perhaps first a version without and later a version where it is included… we will see).
3 [Slow] Improvements and redesign to fit the 2024 rules
This wouldn’t just be an update of the design like in option 2 above, but would also include rethinking some basic functionality of the sheet. To give some examples:
Add a way to overflow Class Features and a space for this overflow to go to.
Once that is working, no class feature option would go to the 3rd-page Notes section, but will instead be part of the same Class Features section(s).
Rework the hit points section:
Display hit points as “X / Y” (e.g. 21 / 42).
Use less space for death saves.
Space for conditions / exhaustion.
Replace the feat/magic item entries with a singular entry type, one that changes name depending on what you select in it. That way, it could include and correctly display things like ( Epic) Boons, Charms, (Chwinga) Blessings, Dark/Draconic/Supernatural Gifts, etc.
More space for attacks (probably as switchable fields on an Overflow page or their own separate Overflow page).
Swap Proficiency checkbox in the attack line for one at the start of the line so the design is more in line with proficiency for feats. Also, hide this checkbox if not applicable for the attack (e.g. for cantrips). This should leave more space for the weapon
Change the ability drop-down for spellcasting attacks to a drop-down of the casting options (i.e. you'd select "Wizard" instead of "Int" for a cantrip).
Add a fourth type of action, “with Attack”, for features that you can use when you make an attack.
The above list are the main things on my wishlist, but more feature requests could be incorporated. You can expect these changes (and more) to be part of the next step.
I’ll be honest, I'm the least hyped for this option. It requires me to put a lot of effort into something that I will then actively try and replace with the “Next Step” (see above). It would be a good way to test my redesign ideas in printed media before trying to create them in a web-app. Valuable playtest information could then be had if many of you use it in your games and provide feedback. However, if that’s worth all the extra effort is questionable.
4 [Slowest] Wait for the web-app
I won’t spend time on updating the PDF and will instead focus on getting the web-app done. It will take some months for basic functionality and longer for full feature parity.
Until that time, I'll help in the community efforts (see below) of getting a working add-on script to add the 2024 rules to the current MPMB character sheets (i.e. no changes to the underlying code).
EDIT 18-10-2024
The web-app will have the same goal as the current PDFs: to print a character sheet for use at the table. As an upside, it will also be more accessible and easier to use as a purely digital sheet.
As there are many similar questions being asked in the comments, please see the FAQ-post about the idea behind the web-app.
A group of dedicated fans, spearheaded by The Pokésimmer, have been hard at work over on the MPMB Discord server to create an add-on script for the 2024 PHB that works with v13.2.1. If you can’t wait on me, please go check out their work here on GitHub and/or join the conversation on Discord. I will probably borrow from the community efforts to speed up my process.
Yes, there will still be a version of the MPMB character sheets for the 2014 5e rules. If a 2024 MPMB sheet is going to be made, the 2014 version and the 2024 version of the rules will each have a separate character sheet PDF. There won’t be a toggle on the sheet to swap from one ruleset to the other, because they have some incompatibilities. Bug fixes will also be applied to both versions, when applicable.
Comments
For making a 2024 build, have a look at the ongoing work on the MPMB Discord server.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-12-09 09:56:25 +0000 UTCI am sooooo sorry I missed the poll. (I own and operate a bar, so I dont get on here much.) Option #2 all the way. I have donated to MPMB for years now and wish I had more screen time, cause I love the PDF and also the layout is just fine. I want to make 2024 character build so bad on MBMP. These results remind me of some other voting results in the US recently. And almost as bad of an outcome. Whats wrong with voters these days. Sheesh. ;P
mark tucker
2024-12-08 19:49:48 +0000 UTCI answered this in the latest post, but in case you missed it: I think you are getting exactly what you want. I'll make a 2024 PDF version as quickly as possible. Because no flashy stuff will be added, I can cut down on time getting this PDF ready. > i would like to ask, will the webapp have the option for creating custom subclasses like the pdf does with the xml homebrew options? The intention is for the web-app to be just as easy (or even easier) when adding homebrew content. This doesn't mean that you can continue using your current add-on scripts, as the format will probably change, but an option to side-load content like the PDFs currently have is an essential feature in my book.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-11-04 16:37:00 +0000 UTCI hope my latest post has taken away some of the uncertainty. A PDF for the 2024 rules will happen, it just won't be a perfect fit for the rules because the sheet's design won't be updated. I'm looking into how to make the web-app as portable as a PDF, because many more have commented about this being the reason why they choose MPMB. The idea (for now) is to make it all work client-side with local storage so that there are no such things as logins, accounts, or expensive servers to run it from.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-11-04 16:28:21 +0000 UTCI really like the functionality of the existing MPMB sheet so I'd be pretty happy with this option!
nitrojane
2024-10-31 04:09:53 +0000 UTCThe polls are incredibly disappointing. While i refuse to give WotC more of my money, i was always happy to give MPMB money for the best character sheet available, unfortunately WotC had to go and make the most unplayable class (Monk) not only playable, but really good. So looks like i'll have to discontinue support and find an alternate option for now. I will say that the web app is a great idea, since it might help me get my players on the same character sheet, since they tend to use web apps that they have to heavily modify, but I have to find a simple solution for myself and my wife for now. i would like to ask, will the webapp have the option for creating custom subclasses like the pdf does with the xml homebrew options?
Muddy Watters
2024-10-27 17:52:18 +0000 UTCThat's fair, you do you. I don't have any plans to discontinue support for the 2014 rules, as is written under the last header "The 2014 version is going nowhere". I'll quote it here: > Yes, there will still be a version of the MPMB character sheets for the 2014 5e rules. If a 2024 MPMB sheet is going to be made, the 2014 version and the 2024 version of the rules will each have a separate character sheet PDF. There won’t be a toggle on the sheet to swap from one ruleset to the other, because they have some incompatibilities. Bug fixes will also be applied to both versions, when applicable. Which rules edition will be used for the web-app has not been decided. This is also addressed in the post above. I'll copy that part here as well: > Whether this web-app will be for both the 2014 and 2024 versions of the rules, or just 2024, is fuel for a future poll. The games I’m playing in are still using the 2014 rules, but they might switch once all three core rulebooks are out.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-22 20:30:36 +0000 UTCIf the sheet changes in a way that does not allow me to exclude all 2024 content and only use stuff from the original version of 5e I will have to discontinue my support of this project, as I refuse to update to the new rule set for a variety of reasons I won't get in to.
beanstheclown .
2024-10-22 20:00:27 +0000 UTCWeb developer here. The reason I prefer PDF over a web-app is because I can store a PDF on Dropbox or on a USB and open/edit/share it anywhere with anybody without worrying about logins, databases being offline, etc. Not to mention I can make as many copies as I need, there's no question about changes to limits, sharing, access. PDFs are files on my computer and I like the freedom that comes with. A web-app, eventually, would be neat and I understand the hype for something shiny and new, but I am shocked to see the polls leaning so hard towards fully waiting on the core PDF product being made usable first. Reading through a lot of the comments and it seems like folks aren't even aware they can use the PDFs without paying for Adobe! But a web-app is also just a completely new set of logistics, such as: Who can make an account? How many characters can be made? What happens when that all starts being super expensive to run? Lots to sort out and waiting on all that to get figured out, it would be nice to be able to carry on playing with the PDFs in the meantime.
Anne Dorko
2024-10-21 12:46:49 +0000 UTCThe new rules change some aspects of character creation. There aren't many things that I've found that would change the built-in code. Basically everything can be accomplished with an add-on script. As for the character sheet design, the new rules do away with things like Background Feature, Personality Traits, Bonds, Ideals, and Flaws. Thus, the sheet will feel a bit strange with space for stuff that isn't used in the rules. Getting the PDF working with the new rules will happen regardless of the web-app, it is more a matter of how much time I should invest in it. I can't really tell how much delay will happen for each option, that is very much something I have to find out by doing. Option 1 will probably not be much more than a week or two.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-21 10:05:53 +0000 UTCI'll put out the call if/when extra hands will be useful. However, in IT I very much understand the saying that "If one programmer can make it in 1 month, 2 programmers can make it in 2 months".
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-21 09:51:56 +0000 UTCWhich rules edition will be used for the web-app is addressed in the post above, but I'll copy that part here: > Whether this web-app will be for both the 2014 and 2024 versions of the rules, or just 2024, is fuel for a future poll. The games I’m playing in are still using the 2014 rules, but they might switch once all three core rulebooks are out.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-21 09:35:38 +0000 UTCA web-app can be made to run offline as well. You'd just need to visit the website once for the app to be available on your machine from then on, even when you are offline. I just made a FAQ post this (and other) recurring questions: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-21 09:34:57 +0000 UTCMy understanding is that the web app will closely resemble the existing Adobe-based MPMB sheet but just run natively in a browser and be more friendly to mobile devices for instance, for those that wish to use it purely digitally
Ben Smith
2024-10-21 00:37:15 +0000 UTCI believe the idea is that the web app is downloaded locally just like any application, but will open up in a web browser. Should work even without internet access.
Ben Smith
2024-10-21 00:32:25 +0000 UTCI dont like web-app idea because i need access character creation even in offline enviroment
Gába
2024-10-20 19:13:47 +0000 UTCI'd be happy to meet you somewhere on that road or help pave it, if you decide you'd like an extra set of hands.
Jonny Miller
2024-10-20 03:12:58 +0000 UTCmy husband and i still play with 2014 rules. we just dont have the money to get all new set of books for something that just the 2 of us are playing.
Dana Folsom
2024-10-20 00:57:33 +0000 UTCSome very good questions, but beyond the scope of the development of the web-app at this point. The intention is not to require accounts for basic functionality, but they might be a necessary (optional) addition for sharing the sheet or saving to the cloud. Which rules edition will be used for the web-app is addressed in the post above, but I'll copy that part here: > Whether this web-app will be for both the 2014 and 2024 versions of the rules, or just 2024, is fuel for a future poll. The games I’m playing in are still using the 2014 rules, but they might switch once all three core rulebooks are out.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 21:06:44 +0000 UTCWotC taking legal action would indeed suck, so I'll definitely try my best to avoid that. Luckily I'm based in the Netherlands, a country that famously doesn't do DMCA requests.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 21:00:42 +0000 UTCWhich rules edition will be used for the web-app is addressed in the post above, but I'll copy that part here: > Whether this web-app will be for both the 2014 and 2024 versions of the rules, or just 2024, is fuel for a future poll. The games I’m playing in are still using the 2014 rules, but they might switch once all three core rulebooks are out.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 20:59:14 +0000 UTCI hear COBOL is very stable, perhaps I should use that? /s But really, the framework shouldn't matter, as there is not one best solution other than the one that gives the desired results. And there are probably many, many roads that lead there.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 20:54:34 +0000 UTCThese are good questions, but a bit too early in the process. how adding custom classes will work is something to look at when that functionality is added. It is very much the plan to be able to add custom content like the sheet currently does. What format that will take is still something to be worked out.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 20:50:24 +0000 UTCAre you currently editing the images/fields on the PDF? Or are you just referring to filling out the character sheet? The latter can be done with the free version, Adobe Acrobat Reader DC, which you can get here: https://get.adobe.com/reader You really only need the paid version if you are making changes to the sheet that are not covered by the options in the menus.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 20:44:06 +0000 UTCCode migration is not really something I'm considering, AI-augmented or not. A fresh start simply offers so much more/better possibilities, especially considering that AcroJS is so outdated.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-19 20:41:57 +0000 UTCApologize if this has been addressed. Will the Web App eventually have the option to use the 5e rules? The PDF is definitely a monster to run on my PC so I get the eventual crash quite often. A web app version would be a relief to have. My husband owns just about every 5e book so starting all over again with this newest edition seems daunting and expensive.
Beth Demshar
2024-10-19 14:35:21 +0000 UTCHi, longtime fan of the sheet here. I've run campaigns for a good six years now and recommend your PDF to all my players, but many still default to D&D Beyond for the accessibility since their phones or PCs can't handle the PDF. I support the idea of a browser app for their sake. That being said, I'm concerned about any kind of cease-and-desist from WotC. 5eTools was already targeted by a DMCA, and I fear that development of a competing app to D&D Beyond with Patreon support would give WotC a legal case to shut down development (using a similar argument as Nintendo shutting down Yuzu). What I really want is for some form of the sheet to continue indefinitely, and for that reason I think sticking with PDF is the safer option.
Sage Porter
2024-10-19 07:20:24 +0000 UTCI would say have it be when you create a character allow us to select which rule set to use. Lastly I would recommend making it a website with a pc app that can connect to the internet to get updates? Maybe have an account? Also making it a pc app allows it to be local storage like the PDF making it to where you don't have to host a server. Lastly as an IT major and programming enthusiast I'd like to also offer my skills.
Davey3223
2024-10-19 03:30:11 +0000 UTCO please not react lol
Dex's Lab
2024-10-19 02:11:30 +0000 UTCI'm totally cool waiting for the webApp and would love to lend my (granted, limited) skills in React and JS as a junior developer to assist if you need more hands! I could definitely use the practice and the experience. If it's in another language, all the better time to learn.
Jonny Miller
2024-10-18 17:33:42 +0000 UTCI'm unfamiliar with the new rules update. I assume from the post that these are things that need to be changed by backend updates to the sheet and not something that can be added in by third-party coders the way subclasses etc are? Most of what I'm seeing on D&D Beyond seems like stuff that other people can write and publish to Reddit or Discord. I think we're going to have a long period where most tables are using the existing 5e stuff because of the opportunity costs for switching: not just the new books or potentially breaking stuff in existing campaigns, but the whole ecosystem of tools like this and third-party supplements that's been built up over the last decade. So if we're talking about delaying the real 2024 solution (the webapp) by a week or two to get the PDF working in the meantime, sure, why not. But I think sinking more time into the PDF than that hits diminishing returns very quickly.
Arch
2024-10-18 17:18:20 +0000 UTCThank you so much! I saw the FAQ today. Awesome work.
Aaron Cloutier
2024-10-18 16:55:02 +0000 UTCI voted for the web app because right now I have to create my player’s character sheets for them since they are technology averse! I think the web app would make it much more accessible, and the entire 2024 rules aren’t out yet (DMG,MM,adventures) so i feel fine waiting. How easy would it be to make new classes for the web app? Are you planning to have an accessible builder for those of us without coding skills but want to contribute hb?
Queerspice
2024-10-18 15:51:56 +0000 UTCYou only need the free Adobe Acrobat reader to use the sheets.
Billy McGee III (Billius McGiles)
2024-10-18 15:46:26 +0000 UTCI will begin looking for an alternative to the MPMB pdf for 5.24 and wish you luck in your future endeavors.
Rob
2024-10-18 15:46:14 +0000 UTCUnderstood, and I hope that this “web app” is not seen as a threat to the other apps on the market.
Rob
2024-10-18 15:45:26 +0000 UTCSo my issue isnt how its produced but how its to be edited. Im trying to get away from Adobe and it rediculous money grab model. Im not a student so $70/month for the full package is STEEP! I'd happily pay $25+ for a web app than $70/month to Adobe
Richard Howard
2024-10-18 15:23:30 +0000 UTCAll very good questions, but beyond the scope of the development of the web-app at this point. The intention is not to require accounts for basic functionality, but they might be a necessary (optional) addition for sharing the sheet or saving to the cloud. And incomplete sheets are not really a thing with MPMB. Leaving fields blank won't stop it from being saved.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:16:19 +0000 UTCI'm honestly also a bit surprised with the results so far. However, regardless of the results of this poll, a workable PDF with the 2024 rules will be made. If option 4 is chosen, that will simply be done only with an add-on script.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:13:32 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:12:08 +0000 UTCI love the web app idea, so it would be more accesible on whatever devices players are using. Have you considered AI-assisted code migration? I understand that most of the time would be dedicated to the design choices and issues anyway, but would be happy to help adopting the approach where LLM does all the heavy lifting in the code refactoring department.
Dead Grem
2024-10-18 15:12:05 +0000 UTCI'll keep up with the PDF, certainly for bug fixes and most likely also for content while the web-app is still in development.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:11:53 +0000 UTCOnline devices don't belong in the hand of players, I agree. Even as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:11:20 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:10:42 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:10:19 +0000 UTCA valid concern. I'll keep in mind to pull the plug on the web-app and continue with the PDF if reaching feature-complete status is unlikely to happen.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:06:01 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:04:54 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:04:17 +0000 UTCA web-app can also be a one time "download" that you can use offline from then on. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 15:03:35 +0000 UTCAh. Well, in that case, an app seems like the way to go. Even it it takes the better part of next year, the idea seems worth the wait.
Derrick Boswell
2024-10-18 14:58:48 +0000 UTCI like the web app idea because I use an android tablet. My group only uses MPMB, but we do all run it digitally. I understand the printed argument, but even when I have printed my sheet, now I slow everyone else down if I need to add or adjust something. Will the web app have an option to save progress on an incomplete sheet and resume later? Will we need to have accounts, logins, whatever? And how easy would it be to run a character fully digitally with the web app?
Wayne Allen
2024-10-18 14:56:36 +0000 UTCI'm not switching any of my 4 campaigns to the new rules, wotc isn't getting any more of my money, so I'm more than happy to wait for the Web app.
Anniek.
2024-10-18 14:51:46 +0000 UTCI understand, a web-app sounds like something very different than a PDF. The intention is for it to be mostly the same, just on a different platform. There are some more reasons to make the switch, you can read more about it in the post I just put up: https://www.patreon.com/posts/114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 14:50:03 +0000 UTCI get that. But I have been supporting this pdr forever. I don't want to give wotc any money re money than necessary especially on a recurring basis. More than 2x the price this patreon costs me? No thanks.
Chris Fatzer
2024-10-18 14:49:05 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/faq-about-next-114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 14:46:53 +0000 UTCEven as a web-app, the primary function of MPMB's sheets will remain the same: to be used printed out. I just made a post to address this (and other) recurring question: https://www.patreon.com/posts/faq-about-next-114245895
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 14:46:34 +0000 UTCI voted for 1 because my table is shifting over to the 24 rules and I'd like to be able to keep using the sheet, but obviously 2 is also fine, if not more work than it feels like you have to be doing if we're getting the web app; no reason to do a bunch of work you're just going to have to leave on the table when you shift over, imo.
atla!!
2024-10-18 14:40:46 +0000 UTCSort of baffled by the votes - having nothing usable at all for the new rules for an indeterminate period? That strikes me as by far the worst option and forces me (and anyone else who is playing under the new rules) to find another resource. Add that to the fact that D&D Beyond is already fully functional as a web app (desktop or phone) for the new rules and I can only scratch my head.
Mark Morris
2024-10-18 13:58:36 +0000 UTCGlad to hear it. Cause for us it's everything, including PHB feats, invocations and backgrounds that weren't reprinted as well. AL decided on a complicated mix and match 😆
BC
2024-10-18 12:32:13 +0000 UTCI agree with the majority here, I still want a printable version; whether that is from option 3 or 4 isn't as important as the fact that I can print it out for use at the table.
Lawrence R. Hoy
2024-10-18 10:48:05 +0000 UTCHow that works for web-apps is unfortunately very dependent on the restrictions put on the machine. A progressive web-app doesn't need an "install" like a classical program, but the system administrator can completely disable them if they wanted to. But as long as the website isn't blocked or if you are allowed to open .html files, it will probably be possible to run a downloaded/cached version of a web-app. I don't know how many people would be in a similar situation that they can only use government/locked-down computers without internet. If there are many, I could definitely look into better solutions. For now, an edge-case like this won't be a primary concern for a web-app, I'm sorry.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 09:48:54 +0000 UTCWell put! I agree that making a digital character sheet without being able to print it out for "pen and paper" use makes no sense.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 09:40:19 +0000 UTCI voted for web app with the assumption that it will have a print to pdf function. If it does not have a print function then what are you even doing?
Tywele
2024-10-18 09:23:06 +0000 UTCAllowing character options from 2014 expansion books that have not been included in the 2024 PHB is certainly the intention (e.g. a subclass from Tasha's Cauldron of Everything).
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 08:49:48 +0000 UTCThe currents sheets are definitely a result of my ADD hyperfocus. I can't count how many nights I've spent working on it instead of sleeping :P
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 08:43:08 +0000 UTCI hoped this was explained well enough in the post, under the header "The 2024 version is going nowhere", but I'll elaborate. Whatever the result of this poll, you will definitely have the option to get a MPMB character sheet PDF that uses just the 2014 rules. There is also a good chance that the web-app will have an option to do so. There won't be a version where you can switch back and forth between the two rulesets, as they are not compatible enough to do so.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-18 08:39:53 +0000 UTCThe web-app looks like the future of the character sheet, regardless what options are chosen in the poll. If that is the case, and there are no further changes/updates to the 2014 sheet, then work on the web-app. Although, please fix any bugs that show up in the existing PDF sheet as well.
Scribbler
2024-10-18 08:20:53 +0000 UTCThe webapp could work for me, if it has a good printing option. I play offline with tablets/laptops 'forbidden' at the table.
Casper Span
2024-10-18 06:58:24 +0000 UTCI really like the PDF but I'd be interested to know more details about the web app. If it's anything like Pathbuilder I'd definitely be down for that. Honestly any of these options are good in my opinion, I don't really have a preference (annoying an answer that may be haha).
nitrojane
2024-10-18 05:44:15 +0000 UTCi would like a web ap. I use chrome os and the pdf i have to use on windows computer. i would like a web app we could print out
madhav boyapati
2024-10-18 03:20:51 +0000 UTCI second that question. More details are needed for me to vote on that option.
Donall Jones
2024-10-18 02:56:50 +0000 UTCI’m always back the Pen and Paper options.
Sean McInnes
2024-10-18 02:14:55 +0000 UTCMy question is what will the web app actually be is it a form that generates a printable documents or a D&D beyond alternative that I keep open all of the time?
Ned Matheson
2024-10-18 00:37:38 +0000 UTCI do not believe my group is going to switch to 5.5 until a new mpmb sheet is available, so I'd prefer 1-3 but definitely not the Web app.
Jacob Kok
2024-10-18 00:27:01 +0000 UTCI would like to pick both 3 and 4.I like the idea of 3 with a easer complete end sheet for printout /save or I would not mind a web app with the completed form at the end for easy print out / save
Ralph Price
2024-10-18 00:02:20 +0000 UTCWhatever it takes to rebuild in an easier to maintain form, if that means a web app then ok
Charles Kelly
2024-10-17 23:56:13 +0000 UTCWhat web app? Just keep up the PDFs please.
Scotia
2024-10-17 23:46:53 +0000 UTCI'm all for the web app because the PDF is enormous, has anyone tried sending it to anybody else? Yikes!
Ed Han
2024-10-17 23:28:51 +0000 UTCI am all for a slow update to the PDF. I am not one that likes using web apps all that often.
Andrew Fagant
2024-10-17 23:25:59 +0000 UTCAlso not interested in a web app. I like the pdf.
Brandy Sevener
2024-10-17 23:22:57 +0000 UTCI'm personally not interested in a web app, I'd rather just have a PDF that works then an app that might never be feature complete. I've unfortunately seen too many of these 5e apps only ever make it to basic functionality before losing steam and just dying.
Max Tompkins
2024-10-17 23:07:26 +0000 UTCI voted for moderate, but would be fine with the fastest option as well. The major redesign sounds like a bad idea if you are planning on doing a web app. That being said, I am also in the camp that would want to print a hard copy from the web app, as I prefer a paper character sheet when I play.
Charles L Allen
2024-10-17 22:47:26 +0000 UTCI think fastest - get something useable for those switching to 2024. Then work on your web app. Fastest can definitely just be aiding in a third-party effort though.
Troy Routley
2024-10-17 22:25:56 +0000 UTCIf you do a web app, for me it would be essential that the web app could print a pdf character sheet. I like the MPMB-Sheet to ease the creation of the character, but I do not like computers used at the table. I am happy with the way it is now.
Heiko
2024-10-17 21:56:48 +0000 UTCI think the web app will greatly improve the over-all user experience and make future development and content updates much easier. Additionally, the 2024 changes bring a lot of needed modifications, but most groups are not likely to convert mid-campaign so there is a good amount of time where the 2014 sheet will still be perfectly fine for those currently using it. The 2024 core rulebooks aren't even all released yet either. As such, I vote for maximizing work on the web-app and not worrying about getting the 2024 content into the PDF version. At this point, any additional work put into the PDF only slows down the web-app, so I think PDF work should be kept to a minimum. I don't consider the "wait for the web-app" option to be the "slowest", I see it as the fastest way to get to a 2024-compatible web-app, at the cost of not getting a 2024 compatible PDF... maybe ever.
zeel
2024-10-17 21:38:59 +0000 UTCI do not use any of the web apps currently available. I do not want to use a web app. The pdf allows me to play without an internet connection. I hope that you support the 5.24 version of the game, I very much enjoy the capabilities that current pdf grants me. Thanks for what you do.
Rob
2024-10-17 21:37:51 +0000 UTCIt's possible that it could end up with a nice print function. We can hope. I understand why people would want the web app, I just don't think it will work for me. I currently manage my character on a PC and "Print to PDF" it (to remove the form fields and JS) before sending it to a Remarkable where I treat it like a paper sheet. No browser on that device.
Aaron Cloutier
2024-10-17 21:31:46 +0000 UTCDue to the way AL decided to implement the 2024 update, I actually need the ability to use the 2024 rules with all the old content that wasn't reprinted. So I voted fastest and would like to request that old content be enabled in whatever new sheet ends up getting made 😅
BC
2024-10-17 21:24:00 +0000 UTCFor me, I'm not interested in web based anything.....to much out there in all aspects of life. Slow update of the existing is the best for me....
Ian Price
2024-10-17 21:17:38 +0000 UTCOur group has elected to not change from 5th to 5.5, so having the old sheet open and no new changes is best.
Lee Bragg
2024-10-17 21:04:05 +0000 UTCI assumed the web-app would be essentially the same as the PDFs, except hosted on a webpage rather than having to download a static PDF, and I would expect there to be a Print function similar to what we have in the PDF today. But these are of course just my assumptions. One advantage I can see is that you'd be able to use it on devices that can't run Adobe with JavaScript (like Android devices, that personally am painfully aware of), as long as they have a web browser.
Zox DK
2024-10-17 21:02:31 +0000 UTCMoving to a web app would be so disappointing. I get it though. Almost everyone at my tables uses D&D beyond. I'm still on paper (though e-paper). I MUCH prefer the layout of MPMB to anything I've seen online or paper. Guess I'll need a different solution for 5e2024... Thanks for all the work you've done on the current sheet!
Aaron Cloutier
2024-10-17 20:53:50 +0000 UTCThe game I DM has already swapped over. My wife, myself, and my best friend all prefer actual paper sheets over apps, so my vote is the "slow" option of completely reformatting the sheet for the 2024 rules. However, I realize that printed sheets are pretty outdated, and that most people would likely prefer an app. So, for the purposes of the poll, I voted "slow". But I understand why the app is so far ahead.
Derrick Boswell
2024-10-17 20:53:33 +0000 UTCI have no skin in the game: my table is sticking to 5e for the foreseeable future. As a supporter, I want you to do what makes the most sense to you. As stated elsewhere, by Seskef De Rishton: you've never steered us wrong; we trust you. If you are in ADHD lock, go with the fastest option (results are your jam) or the web-app option (you need a good hyperfocus). Thank you for all your hard work on our behalf
Smokiechick
2024-10-17 20:49:32 +0000 UTCNone of my games have plans to swap to v2024 (we have a lot of investment in 5e books.) I voted for option 2 because if a second sheet is being made, it would be most convenient to have a clear visual distinction between incompatible versions. It appears option 4 (wait for web app) is winning which is also a very acceptable option. Thank you for continuing to support the original 5e.
Carson Elmore
2024-10-17 20:26:13 +0000 UTCI'd like to see 2 version (I know, more work). One pre- and one post-2024 changes. I'd like the option to ignore the 2024 changes.
Eli Silverman
2024-10-17 20:25:58 +0000 UTCFeel free to ignore my question. I now see your reply to Holy Pickle
Mitchell Swan
2024-10-17 20:24:41 +0000 UTCWill it then export to a PDF? To be honest, I use your sheet far more because I like the layout better than anything else I've found, more so for the javascript (which is AWESOME, btw, it just takes a minimal margin of a back seat to the layout.)
Mitchell Swan
2024-10-17 20:21:11 +0000 UTCMy vote is I trust you, however you want and think is best. You’ve never led us stray before and it is your baby and all.
Seskef De Rishton
2024-10-17 20:20:04 +0000 UTCA web-app can be made to work on any device, all that is required is a browser. Mobile support is high on the wishlist, although that is probably the hardest beast to tackle (properly). But no, I have no plans on making a platform specific app (e.g. one that only works on Android).
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-17 20:18:26 +0000 UTCI've always just used 5 boxes for my Death Saves. ✓X✓✓ - Yay ✓XX✓X - Boo That can save you a bit of space...
Mitchell Swan
2024-10-17 20:17:04 +0000 UTCAfter all these years can we expect an Android app? It would be very convenient...
Domin(ic)us Multivius
2024-10-17 20:14:48 +0000 UTCBasically to be able to use stuff that can be done in a browser but can't be done in a PDF, or that require a lot of extra effort in a PDF. Think of things like better pop-up dialogs, comprehensive searching in a drop-down box, or changing the order of the pages. Also, everything mentioned under option 3.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-17 20:09:07 +0000 UTCThings are perfect as is. Vote Fastest!
Gregor McConnell
2024-10-17 20:04:57 +0000 UTCSoftware Engineering Director here. Take the time to do what you want to do, and do it well (I'm assuming this is #4). I'll be happy using notebook paper for the indefinite future if you can deliver turning your awesomeness into a web-app. My sub won't go anywhere.
Call0Me0Ishmael
2024-10-17 20:04:10 +0000 UTCI care far more about quality over quantity. i'd love to see a fully functional app, rather than one that's quick and buggy.
Brad Sampson
2024-10-17 20:02:21 +0000 UTCI voted fastest because I would like to be able to use the new stuff but a sheet is a sheet, as long as it has details somewhere that's all that's needed. I'm excited to hear about the web app!
L0neGamer
2024-10-17 19:59:37 +0000 UTCI voted for 4. The community is eager to help where we can, and you should leverage that. As long as your supporters have the tools, we can support the creation of the webapp by helping to maintain the PDFs ourselves while you focus on the next big thing. That's my opinion, at least.
Essephex
2024-10-17 19:59:15 +0000 UTCIn thank you and the community for keeping this project going through these rules changes. I have not yet moved to the 2024 rules, so I am content to wait on the app version, especially since the community is working on the addon to adapt the PDF sheet currently. This seems like the best case for all concerned as it frees your time to concentrate on the next evolution, while still providing players a workable solution in the short run for either rules set.
Pope J-rod
2024-10-17 19:58:16 +0000 UTCI agree. MPMB is a god send for me cuz I use it when deployed with zero internet. Also I can throw a PDF on a government computer without issues so everyone can use it. Installing programs or internet connection however would be a hard no go for me.
Javier Molina
2024-10-17 19:58:02 +0000 UTCI think very few tables are actively playing with the 2024 rules yet and it's possible to make do with existing sheets. Focusing on the web-app means that'll happen faster, and that better solution will be coming online as more tables start using the new rules
Scott Miller
2024-10-17 19:57:40 +0000 UTCOk then I stick with my vote of fastest 😂
Javier Molina
2024-10-17 19:56:30 +0000 UTCOne of the things on the wishlist for the web-app is to make it work stand-alone without an internet connection. Just as portable as a PDF, but you'd need a browser instead of Adobe Acrobat to use it.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-17 19:56:11 +0000 UTCThe difference is not days, I can guarantee you it will be months.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-17 19:55:59 +0000 UTCOne of the things on the wishlist for the web-app is to make it work stand-alone without an internet connection. Just as portable as a PDF, but you'd need a browser instead of Acrobat to use it.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-17 19:55:16 +0000 UTCQuestion about the web app. Will it require internet or any install?
Javier Molina
2024-10-17 19:53:37 +0000 UTCWeb app it is :)
Holy Pickle
2024-10-17 19:53:21 +0000 UTCI’d say depending on time lines. If it’s weeks or months for difference then as I voted (fastest). However if the difference to the next step up is just a few days then go with that.
Javier Molina
2024-10-17 19:52:38 +0000 UTCA web-app would be a dream come true.
SpookyGeist
2024-10-17 19:52:32 +0000 UTCFrankly I am not interested in a webapp. We don't always have connectivity and what I love about the MPMB sheet is it is all offline and local and I just print at home and we are good to go. D&D Beyond .....😝
Jim sharples
2024-10-17 19:52:24 +0000 UTCWhat's the vision for the web app?
Noldere
2024-10-17 19:52:23 +0000 UTCAbsolutely, although I'm not sure if it is going to be save as PDF or print at this time. I'm dedicated to making a character sheet that you can print out and use with pencil and eraser at the table, because that is how I use character sheets. The fundamental idea behind the MPMB sheets won't change, just the medium they come in.
MorePurpleMoreBetter
2024-10-17 19:52:06 +0000 UTCI am not voting because I will not be using the 2024 changes.
Melissa Beitz
2024-10-17 19:50:53 +0000 UTCWill the web app include an export to pdf function or print option?
Holy Pickle
2024-10-17 19:48:31 +0000 UTC