NokiMo
The Race
The Race

patreon


Ask Edd Straw about his Australian GP driver rankings!

After every grand prix, Edd Straw answers your questions and comments about his F1 driver rankings exclusively for The Race Members' Club on Patreon.

Have a read of his full rankings below, then leave your message for Edd in the comments at the bottom of the post!

Started: 6th Finished: 5th

Amid the focus on his new team-mate Carlos Sainz, Alex Albon proved to be Williams’s spearhead with an outstanding qualifying and race performance.

Given the Williams is still a little wind sensitive, he did well to avoid any significant errors in the race, and although he lost a place to Kimi Antonelli late on, the pace advantage of the Mercedes and the ease of the DRS pass meant that there was probably little he could have done to hold onto fourth.

Verdict: Got the most out of the car.

Started: 1st Finished: 1st

Lando Norris looked every bit the favourite from the start of practice, converting that speed into pole position with a small but crucial edge over McLaren team-mate Oscar Piastri.

The race was a little trickier, particularly in the phase when Piastri was quicker and threatening him before team orders intervened, although Norris can be forgiven for the trip through the gravel at Turn 12 given the sudden rain.

What mattered more was he had the presence of mind to gather it up and dive into the pit, in doing so ensuring he held the lead.  

Verdict: Carried favourite status superbly.

Started: 3rd Finished: 2nd

Even with a car deficit, Max Verstappen did everything he could to menace McLaren.

By his own admission, he could have extracted a fraction more in Q3 but it wouldn’t have impacted his third position. He also made an error early on that allowed Piastri to pass him.

Despite those minor criticisms, it was a typically dogged Verstappen performance - one that put him close to being able to challenge Norris for the lead in the final two laps. 

Verdict: Always a threat.

Started: 4th Finished: 3rd

There’s little to say about George Russell’s weekend beyond the fact that he got everything he could out of the Mercedes. He couldn’t have done better in qualifying and the race, with the only minor negatives the two brief, but inconsequential, offs during practice.

His approach to the grand prix was particularly mature, Russell recognising that he couldn’t go with the McLarens or Verstappen and driving his own race.

Verdict: Maximised the car.

Started: 5th Finished: 12th

Until lap 44 of the 57-lap grand prix, Yuki Tsunoda’s weekend couldn’t have been better.

He aced qualifying, heading the midfield, and didn’t put a foot wrong as he ran in the top six.

But when the rain came, shortly after he’d passed Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari for fifth, everything unravelled.

Tsunda had a bite of the gravel at Turn 12 on lap 45, beginning a slide that cost him places to Pierre Gasly and both Ferraris. Racing Bulls left him out on slicks until lap 47, meaning he rejoined 11th, losing another place to Piastri by the flag.

Verdict: Outstanding, but undone by the return of the rain. 

Started: 16th Finished: 4th

Debutant Kimi Antonelli was a joy to watch around Albert Park, and although there were some mishaps - notably damaging the front of his Mercedes’ floor with a wide moment at Turn 6 that led to his elimination in Q1 and a spin during the race after dropping a wheel off the road - he avoided the bigger mistakes that ruined the weekend for others.

Fortune played a part in him jumping from 10th to fifth in terms of the timing of his lap-44 pitstop, but he also picked off Albon with a pass on the penultimate lap. 

Verdict: Prodigious speed among the inevitable rough edges. 

Started: 17th Finished: 7th

An untidy final part of Nico Hulkenberg’s last Q1 lap cost him a place in Q2, which was unfortunate as he had the pace to have made it.

His race was a tidy but tricky one in a Sauber that wasn’t quick enough to climb into the points - not least because a lack of straightline speed made passing difficult - until the team’s razor-sharp call to come in on lap 44 catapulted him up to seventh. 

Verdict: Only slight qualifying underachievement counts against him.

Started: 13th Finished: 6th

Lance Stroll qualified just three hundredths of a second off Fernando Alonso, and while his Aston Martin team-mate’s floor damage narrowed that gap slightly, Stroll’s qualifying performance was still decent.

He was one of the few to drive a clean race with no significant errors. Although Alonso was again faster, the fact Stroll avoided his team-mate’s fate vindicated an approach he described as “tippy-toeing around”.

Verdict: A very tidy weekend. 

Started: 2nd Finished: 9th

This was so close to a great weekend for Piastri, who pushed McLaren team-mate Norris hard in qualifying but just lost out, and then was on the receiving end of team orders at a point where he looked like the quicker of the two mid-race.

He was also just on the wrong side of another fine margin, spinning onto the grass when recovering from his Turn 12 off while Norris escaped, condemning Piastri to a bitterly disappointing ninth. 

Verdict: Proved he’s not there to be number two.

Started: 9th Finished: 11th

Alpine had a tougher time in Australia than expected given the promise of Bahrain testing, with Gasly describing the weekend as “harder than we thought”.

Although he wasn’t able to assert himself over team-mate Jack Doohan in terms of pace, Gasly did a good job to put the car in Q3 and monopolise ninth place until the rain came.

After pitting, he held eighth but a small mistake at the first corner meant he was shuffled back behind the Ferraris and Piastri - although the real damage was done by Antonelli, Stroll and Hulkenberg all making the switch back to inters before him and jumping ahead. 

Verdict: His efforts merited points.

Started: 7th Finished: 8th

Leclerc showed startling pace at times during practice, but tyre troubles held Ferrari back in qualifying and the anticipated pole position challenge never materialised.

Having held fifth for three-quarters of the race, he struggled when the rain returned, being passed by Tsunoda and having a spin, although Ferrari’s decision to leave him out on slicks until lap 47 cost him a stronger result. 

Verdict: Erratic performance largely down to Ferrari’s fluctuations. 

Started: 8th  Finished: 10th

Lewis Hamilton’s first Ferrari weekend was disappointing in terms of the car performance and results, but he made good progress in closing the gap to team-mate Leclerc through practice - showing signs that he’s getting to grips with the Ferrari.

It’s those signs of progress during that made this a productive if - by his own lofty standards - so-so weekend that proves there is much more to come. 

Verdict: A qualified success. 

Started: 18th Finished: 13th

On a terrible weekend for pace for Haas, which struggled badly in the high-speed corners, Esteban Ocon’s driving was the least of the team’s problems.

He did what he could in what was, by some margin, the slowest car, which meant he had little opportunity to catch the eye despite doing exactly the job the team needed him to do. 

Verdict: A clean weekend in the slowest car.

Started: 15th Finished: DNF

It was unfortunate that Gabriel Bortoleto’s grand prix debut ended with him spinning into the wall given he’d caught the eye with his performance in an improved, but still tricky Sauber.

Making Q2 was an achievement, although “skateboarding” the Turn 4 exit kerb meant he didn’t maximise that opportunity.

In the race, he battled a brake problem and lost five seconds for an unsafe pit release before losing it on the exit kerb at Turn 12 after switching back to intermediates. 

Verdict: A good debut despite the bad ending. 

Started: 14th Finished: DNF

Doohan’s pace was strong, at times giving him the edge over Gasly.

He might well have turned that into a Q3 place as he was close to the pace of his Alpine team-mate when his final Q2 run was ruined by yellow flags, meaning he had to back off having been within hundredths of Gasly out of Turn 10.

But the promising weekend was shattered when he shunted on the straight on the opening lap.

Verdict: Genuinely quick before his lap-one blunder.

Started: 12th Finished: DNF

Alonso had a good turn of speed in the Aston Martin, but uncharacteristically made mistakes in both qualifying and the race.

Floor damage for a wide moment in Q2 cost him any chance of nicking a Q3 place, while he was running 10th when he lost it exiting Turn 6 and crashed - blaming that on gravel kicked up by Gasly.

Verdict: Qualifying and race errors meant pace was wasted.

Started: Pits (19th)  Finished: DNF

Although he was unique in never having raced at Albert Park before, and had FP3 ruined by an air intake problem, Liam Lawson’s Red Bull debut was disappointing to say the least.

Not only did he struggle for pace, but he had two offs on his way to Q1 elimination then crashed out of the race having made little progress through midfield. His season starts in China.

Verdict: Worryingly Perez-like.

Started: Pits (20th) Finished: 14th

Practice was a disaster, Ollie Bearman crashing exiting Turn 10 in FP1, missing FP2 as a result then binning it on the first flying lap of FP3 after dropping a wheel onto the grass at the entry to Turn 11.

A gearbox glitch meant he couldn’t run in qualifying, with suspension set-up changes prompting a pitlane start.

His race was a good one given the poor machinery, but it couldn’t compensate for what came before.

Verdict: Let himself down badly in practice. 

Started: 10th Finished: DNF

Although he showed strong pace at times, when it came to qualifying Sainz wasn’t as comfortable extracting the most out of the softs as Williams team-mate Albon.

He described qualifying as “scruffy”, but reached Q3 with ease and ended up 0.086s off his team-mate’s pace - a good effort considering he’s still familiarising himself with the Williams.

That foundation was thrown away when he crashed under safety-car conditions at the end of the first lap as a result of “a big torque kick from a poor upshift”.

Verdict: Safety-car crash destroys his ranking.

Started: 11th Finished: DNS

Judged purely on practice and qualifying, Isack Hadjar performed impressively despite his limited experience.

He only just missed out on Q3, lapping 0.166s off Racing Bulls team-mate Tsunoda, and looked well-set for a good debut.

Unfortunately, he ruined his weekend when he lost it on a white line on the formation lap and crashed out before he’d even started.

The definition of a rookie error, but one that can’t be excused when it comes to his ranking. 

Verdict: Formation-lap disaster undid his good work.

Ask Edd Straw about his Australian GP driver rankings!

Comments

How much weight is put on ‘reading the conditions’ in the ranking? Tsunoda and Albon had basically ran together all weekend until Williams and VCARB differed in their pit calls. Was it difficult to relegate Tsunoda as far away from Albon as a result?

Alex Raghunath

British Bias

David Walton

Definitely. Whether the driver comes from the back to win or leads the whole race and shows a massive pace advantage, they need to show that they were majorly above everyone else on that day. It was a really impressive win from Norris but he wasn’t head and shoulders above the rest of them

Michael Sanderson

It’s always been a factor

Harvey Smith

Most commentary on Hamiltons performance this weekend seems to allow him space to learn the car/team/working relationships etc. I don’t recall this having been a major factor in assessing early race performance when drivers have changed team previously e.g. Alonso to Aston Martin in 2023. Considering he’s the most statistically successful F1 driver in history, are these allowances actually too generous?

Anne

I was massively surprised by Brundle’s comment, as he’s usually fairly measured. I actually read through these comments tonight to see if anyone else was as surprised - so pleased to see that it wasn’t only me who felt the comment was overkill. To be fair even Lando looked a bit surprised when Brundle doubled down when they were speaking in the pitlane after the race. A really good drive from Lando for sure but I don’t personally think it compares to Max in Brazil last year, an all time great drive would ideally need an overtake or two in the mix?

Anne

I'm surprised that Hadjar's one error counted more against him than Bearman's two errors? I get that it put him out of the race but Bearman's had a more negative impact on his team arguably? How do you make the decision on weighting those? I guess Hadjar's is seen as worse as it was in the race? (Well...nearly)

James Nicholson

Why is Hulkenberg only seventh in the rankings? It feels like a greater achievement to get 7th in the race given the car he was driving being slowest…along with Haas.

Oliver Dale

It should as there is a difference in when the mistake is made, where and the recovery.

Robert Pepper

I enjoy that with the rankings there is no option to give an equal score - you have to choose who to put higher or lower and why. Especially fun this race with multiple drivers making compelling cases for both 1st and 20th! How close were your top and bottom 3 - i feel like they could’ve been in any order?

OC

Honestly i think hadjar is judged to harshly. He showed better than many of us thought he could. Guess i'd have placed sainz last, he might've done better with all of his expierence.

Ben

The great thing about the conditions and this race are that it reminded us how hard it is to drive an F1 car. Drivers can look so under control these days and rookies regularly come in and score debut points, so it was reassuring to get a reminder that these cars need superlative skills to drive them.

John O'Hara

Is it fair to say that for the purposes of the rankings, the FP sessions can only hurt, not help drivers? Bearman is certainly higher without his struggles in practices (imo), but it would be absence of said struggles that boosted him, not anything he did in practice, unless there was something truly magnificent.

Chuck Aoki

9th I would say is incredibly harsh on Piastri, he was quicker than Norris once he’d managed to pass verstappen and was looking like he was going to pass him on track until the intervention of team orders halted him in his tracks. Both Norris and Piastri making the same mistake albeit with different consequences shouldn’t lead to such a big difference in ratings

Jake Britton

"Massive caveat" articulates perfectly what I was trying to say. It's not that they weren't errors, but it does illuminate that it was jolly tricky for everyone.

Simon Emms

I'm trying to think of what would be considered an unacceptable error in such challenging conditions? I also agree that when you see significantly more experienced drivers crash the conditions throw a massive caveat on rookie errors... But someone has to come last.

Alexander Law

It looks even worse when you consider that we’re only a few months removed from Max going from 17th to first in worse conditions and with a car that wasn’t working well at that point

Michael Sanderson

I almost spat out my cup of tea when Brundle said that. Anyone would have thought that he DIDN’T have the best car, DIDN’T just pip his team mate to pole by 8 hundreds, he DIDN’T have a team order to hold position when he was most vulnerable, that he DIDN’T have his team mate shadow him the whole race, that he DIDN’T throw it off the road and get lucky. Was a good drive in tricky conditions, don’t get me wrong. But an all time great win? Not even close.

Tim

If you had to say in percentages what the race weighed in comparison to practice and quali. (Seeing as bearman who had an okay race was rated so low)

Ranchdingus

Did the fact that Alonso and Sainz made rookie errors inform how you rated the rookies who made rookie errors? When I saw Hadjar and Doohan crash out, I recognised how tricky the conditions were when Sainz did the same.

Simon Emms

In some ways, were the bottom five drivers harder to rank than the top five this weekend? I don't disagree with who's in your bottom five as they all made extremely bad errors at one point, but how did you differentiate who's error was worse than someone else's?

Stuart Coulter

I’m wondering - we have Hamilton, Sainz and Hulkenberg as very experienced drivers going to a new team and then we have the rookies What’s harder - going from one team to another and having to unlearn a number of car traits and learn a set of new ones (which seemed to catch Carlos out and Hamilton has talked about extensively as his key challenge) Or being a brand new F1 driver who doesn’t have the same unlearning to do, but doesn’t have the large bank of experience to draw on?

Rich Snape

Hey Edd, happy to see this feature back! Good reasonable rankings overall as always. Here are the minor tweaks I would consider: - Antonelli could be a position or two higher because I think he might be the driver who impressed the most in the race, which should make up for his earlier weekend struggles. I also think this might be one of those cases where outside metrics, like expectations, should factor in. Performing like this in your very first race should give you bonus points, especially if you compare it to how much every other rookie struggled. But it is also understandable to have Russell and Tsunoda higher because they also did very well and were tidier overall. - I might swap Stroll and Hülkenberg because Stroll had the more complete performance if you factor in qualifying. - I think the Sainz and Hadjar ratings are harsh compared to people like Bearman or Lawson. You explained your reasoning on this before, but I don't think in this case making one very bad mistake on the formation lap or behind the safety car is worse than having absolutely shambolic weekends, as Bearman and Lawson did. The negative impact on the teams (no points and a repair bill) were just as bad with Lawson and Bearman too, if not worse.

David Trippler

Do you keep a ‘pound for pound’ driver ranking list ‘either in your mind or actual’ and who do you expect to have the highest average ranking this year?

Chris Parrott

It can't always be clear how much influence a driver had on strategy choices. So do you hold a poor tyre call against a driver every time, only when it's clear they were actively pushing for said call or never because the focus is on the driving?

Jan Alexander

My only criticism would be Sainz. Assuming it was a car issue that caused the spin, and his pace in Qualy relative to Albon - being below those who spun multiple times feels harsh.

Gareth Anstee

Martin Brundle described this as ‘one of the all time great wins’ from Lando Norris. I personally thought that was overkill and you ranked him second behind Albon, so where do you stand on the quality of Norris’s victory in relation to other great wins and what could he have done to secure top spot?

Michael Sanderson

Given it was a fairly calamitous race for most of the rookies in the rain, how would your rookies rankings have differed if you had made the decision based on qualifying alone?

Rob Fuller

Playing hypothetical here … Let’s pretend that when Lando and Oscar ran wide, it was Lando who beached his car, got it going again, and came 9th, whilst Oscar went on to win. What would you have ranked them then? [Edd - please don’t take the above as a criticism, I actually agree with your rankings … I’m just interested to see how this would’ve played out for you. FWIW - I would have had Oscar 3rd and Lando 7th if that had happened].

Michael Holden

How much does a practice spin / lockup into the runoff area impact rankings? Does it depend on damage and out of the session?

Alex Hindley

A 9th in the rankings is extremely kind to Piastri - and I say this as an Australian who has had a long term interest in his career. Given what he did show, how do you rate the likelihood of Oscar taking it to Lando over the year?

Rio


Related Creators