no matter how low.. they dont tell u ur baby can turn full retard. and then they changed the law to protect vaccine companies? and then they refuse to study and/ or fuck with the data? makes no sense if theyre genuinely just trying to help. clearly an agenda behind it imo
YB
2021-07-29 16:45:34 +0000 UTC
I'd say in summary I found the whole thing a little messy. Every couple minutes I saw something a little manipulative or deliberately misleading and that put me off a lot of the people talking and their case. The exponential increase in cases to me wouldn't actually match up with the use of the vaccine. Why would 1 in 2 babies have autism in 2032 if use of the vaccine stays flat? I think diagnosis and recording of autism has likely changed instead, or other factors changing it. Overall though I'm surprised there was no study at the time on vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's many unintentional side effects triggered in a low percentage of cases.